US WITHDRAWAL AND REGIONAL DYNAMICS

            

In the previous article, THE ‘DOHA’ WAY FOR TALIBAN, we discussed the Doha agreement, its provisions and its criticisms. In this article, we’ll be discussing the regional dynamics after the withdrawal.

The speedy withdraw of US troops from Afghanistan has been matched by the swift advance of the Taliban across the nation. Although, the US has confirmed that 90% of the withdrawal is done. The Taliban has claimed that it is in control of 85% of Afghanistan territory.

These developments have moved Afghanistan into the court of regional powers that now have the burden of managing the military vacuum created by the US retreat.

The idea of a regional solution to Afghanistan has always had much political appeal. Further, divergent regional strategic perspectives limit the prospects for a sustainable consensus on Afghanistan.

US WITHDRAWAL AND REGIONAL POWERS

• Taliban: Taliban itself remains a major variable. If the Taliban doesn’t accommodate the Afghan interests, they will simply move towards another round of the civil war.
  
  • The Taliban is also signaling not to be a proxy for anyone else and that it will pursue independent policies.
• China: The US withdrawal from Afghanistan today reinforces the strongly held conviction in China that the US is in terminal decline.
  
  
  • Additionally, the withdrawal, at a time when China is offering an alternative to the Western model of international governance, seems a great ideological victory to China.
  • However, for China, potential Taliban support to the Xinjiang separatist groups is a major concern.
• India: India will have three critical areas in dealing with the Taliban.
  
  
  • Protecting its investments, which run into billions of rupees, in Afghanistan;
  • Preventing a future Taliban regime from being a pawn of Pakistan;
  • Making sure that the Pakistan-backed anti-India terrorist groups do not get support from the Taliban.
• Other: None of the regional countries wants to see Afghanistan becoming the nursery of international terror again under the Taliban.
  
  
  • Iran can’t ignore the Sunni extremism of the Taliban and its oppressive record in dealing with the Shia, and Persian-speaking minorities.
  • Pakistan worries about the danger of the conflict spilling over to the east of the Durand Line, and hostile groups like the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) gaining sanctuaries in Afghanistan.

INDIA’S APPROACH:

• The era of prolonged peace in Afghanistan secured by the US military presence has come to its end.
  
  • This would mean new constraints on India’s ability to operate inside Afghanistan.
• Three structural conditions will continue to shape India’s Afghan policy.
  
  • One is India’s lack of direct physical access to Afghanistan. This underlines the importance of India having effective regional partners.
  • Pakistan has the capability to destabilize any government in Afghanistan. But it does not have the power to construct a stable and legitimate order in Afghanistan.
  • The contradiction between the interests of Afghanistan and Pakistan is an enduring one.

• Pakistan likes to turn Afghanistan into a protectorate, but Afghans deeply value their independence. All Afghan sovereigns, including the Taliban, will look for partners to balance Pakistan.
• India should focus on intensifying its engagement with various Afghan groups, including the Taliban and finding effective regional partners to secure its interests in a changing Afghanistan.

WAY FORWARD:

• Use of Multilateral Organizations: As Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) should be used in dealing with the Afghan questions and achieve stability.
  
  • Geography, membership and capabilities make the SCO an important forum to address the post-American challenges in Afghanistan.
• An independent, sovereign, democratic, pluralistic and inclusive Afghanistan is crucial for peace and stability in the region.
  
  • In order to ensure the same, the Afghan peace process, as stated by India’s Afghan policy, should be Afghan-led, Afghan-owned and Afghan-controlled.
• Also, there is a need for the global community to fight against the global concern of terrorism.
  
  • In this context, it is high time to adopt the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (proposed by India at UN in 1996).
• Admin and Military Reforms: More militancy witnessed in the region where the state fails to deliver. Thus, Administrative and military reforms within Afghanistan are the need of the hour to tackle the menace of emerging Taliban 2.0.

CONCLUSION:

• The US’s exit from Afghanistan has triggered Taliban emergence, geopolitical flux and thus, instability in the region.
• As these factors will increasingly push India into a geopolitical tough spot in the region, smart statecraft. Therefore, is essential to deal with changing dynamics in Afghanistan.
• If India remains active and patient too, many opportunities could open up in the new Afghan phase.

In the next article, we’ll be discussing “Should India engage in talks with Taliban?” along with the reasons why India is not engaging and reasons of why India should engage. So, stay tuned!!

Also Read| PSEUDO-FEMINISM: Unwinding the Saga